Legal Opinion

Biggins v. Raisch

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1895No. 15771PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The iacts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtVanclief, J.

Thomas Biggins died testate in the county of Marin, September 8, 1879. On October 6, 1879, the will was proved and Patrick Mallon was appointed executor thereof, and executed a bond for the faithful pertormance of his duties in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars, with the defendants and Patrick Burns as sureties thereon. Patrick Burns died before the commencement of this action. The executor, Patrick Mallon, died testate on January 26, 1890, without having closed the administration of the estate and without having rendered any account thereof to the probate court. On February 17, 1890,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chaquette v. OrtetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Humphreys v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Botkin v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Cole & Blocker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Crumrine v. DizdarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Snyder v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API