Legal Opinion

Sullens & Hoss, Inc. v. Farvour

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 18, 1954No. A-6779PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCARREY, Jr., District Judge.

This cause of action arose upon a lien filed by the plaintiff against property belonging to the defendant, Henry E. Farvour, for building supplies and materials sold by the plaintiff to him between May 1, 1950 and October 9, 1950, and while the defendant made a token payment upon this indebtedness, there is an unpaid remaining balance in the sum of $1,340.82. In compliance with Territorial Law, the plaintiff filed a lien against Lot Eighteen (18) Block Four (4), and Lot One (1) Block Twenty-six (26) Fairview Subdivision Extension, located in Sections Ten (10) and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linch v. PerrineIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ketcham v. CunliffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Johnson v. HallsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1927
  4. Irvine v. McDougallDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. ParrillaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
  3. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. (Naknek Electric Ass'n)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2012
  4. H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API