Legal Opinion · Dissent

H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1977No. 2871Published

1DissentBoochever, Chief Justice

While I agree that the corporate ac-knowledgements affixed to the claims of lien are not tantamount to verifications, I dissent from the holding that the claims of lien may not be upheld under Alaska’s liberal validation statute, AS 34.35.020. The statute states:

Sufficiency in Hen notice or pleadings.(a)No mistake in formality or lack of statement in the lien notice or the pleadings is ground for dismissal or unnecessary delay in an action to foreclose a lien.(b)Substantial compliance with the law relating to the contents of the lien notice is considered sufficient, if the notice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Juneau Clinic Building CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ex Parte WoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Alaska Exploration Co. v. Northern Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API