Legal Opinion
Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of Pasadena
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 1983No. Civ. 67350PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Plaintiffs are employee organizations and active and retired members of the Pasadena Fire and Police Retirement System (the System). They brought this action for injunctive and declaratory relief and writ of mandate to declare invalid certain amendments to the pension plan as violative of the members’ vested contract rights. The trial court rendered judgment for defendants, concluding that the amendments did not impair the members’ vested contract rights. Plaintiffs appeal.
The provisions relating to the System are contained in article XV of the Pasadena City Charter. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Okun v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Claypool v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Medical Operations Management, Inc. v. National Health Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- United Firefighters v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.