Legal Opinion

Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2004No. S107855PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In this case, a trucking company participated in the California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan (the CAARP), a statutorily created program governed by the Insurance Commissioner designed to make automobile liability insurance available to those unable to obtain insurance through ordinary methods. After a premium billing dispute with its insurance company, which was hired by the CAARP, the trucking company defended a collection action and filed a cross-complaint against the company alleging that it had retroactively and knowingly charged it a substantially higher premium than…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Levine v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. EFG Bank AG v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API