Legal Opinion

People v. McKeehan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1909No. Crim. No. 121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County, and from an order denying a new trial. Franklin J. Cole, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Information for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. Verdict of assault with a deadly weapon. Appeal from judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Defendant was the keeper of a pool and billiard hall, and the complaining witness, Martin, was at the time of the occurrence upon which the charge is based a constable at Brawley, in the county of Imperial, where the 'billiard-hall was located. About two weeks prior to the trouble between them Martin raided the premises mentioned in search of “booze,” as he testified, at which time he destroyed some…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. Western Turf Assn.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ex Parte MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. OldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Pueblo v. Díaz DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1974
  4. Biagini v. ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API