Legal Opinion

Biagini v. Shoemaker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1922No. 17306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

-Cutting through the shell of this case and getting down to the meat in the cocoanut, we find an action by the proprietors of a soft-drink establishment, in Tacoma, to enjoin the police officers of that city from placing and maintaining in the establishment un-uniformed police officers. Injunction is sought upon the ground that this interference by the police officers constitutes a continuing trespass, and that equity should restrain such conduct.

The testimony in the case discloses that the appellants are operating under a license from the city of *205Tacoma allowing them to sell soft drinks and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Canon City v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Cunningham's Administrator v. SpeagleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Asiatic Club v. BiggyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Andrieux v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monfrino v. Gutelius, MayorOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API