Biagini v. Shoemaker
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
-Cutting through the shell of this case and getting down to the meat in the cocoanut, we find an action by the proprietors of a soft-drink establishment, in Tacoma, to enjoin the police officers of that city from placing and maintaining in the establishment un-uniformed police officers. Injunction is sought upon the ground that this interference by the police officers constitutes a continuing trespass, and that equity should restrain such conduct.
The testimony in the case discloses that the appellants are operating under a license from the city of *205Tacoma allowing them to sell soft drinks and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Canon City v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Cunningham's Administrator v. SpeagleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Asiatic Club v. BiggyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Andrieux v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Monfrino v. Gutelius, MayorOhio Court of Appeals · 1939