Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Murphy
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1908No. Crim. No. 85PublishedCited by 20 opinions
PETITION for writ of habeas corpus to the marshal of the City of South Pasadena. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Ordinance No. 262, duly adopted by the city of South Pasadena, and entitled, “An Ordinance for police regulation, relating to billiard halls, pool rooms, and places where billiard and pool tables are kept for hire or public use in the city of South Pasadena,’’ provides:
“The Board of Trustees of the City of South Pasadena do ordain as follows:
“Section 1. It shall be, and is hereby made unlawful for any person or persons, individually or by association with others, either as owner, principal, clerk, agent, servant or employee, to establish, open, keep,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Tarkio v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- In Re WeisbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Matter of EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Baer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.