People v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny upon an information charging him with robbery. He appeals from the judgment therein rendered, and from an order denying a new trial.
His first point is, that the court erred in refusing to set aside an information filed on the 23d of October, 1889.
*600An information for the same offense had been filed on the 7th of September, 1889, and was set aside, on motion, on the 31st of October, 1889, after the second information had been filed.
The reasons assigned why the court should have set aside the last information are, that the magistrate who…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. BarricCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. MaughsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. BrommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.