Earl v. Lofquist
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
OGDEN, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent after his demurrer to appellants’ amended complaint was sustained and the latter declined to amend. Although the defendant R. W. Nuttall is now deceased and substitution has been made, he is referred to herein as respondent.
The action is representative in character, being brought by appellants as shareholders on behalf of the defendant Lopez Canyon Oil Company, a corporation, its directors refusing to bring suit. It is based upon fraud and seeks the recovery to the corporation of certain real property in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Fleishhacker v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Turner v. MilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.