Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Ingold

California Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1952No. L. A. 21794PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This ease presents to this court for the first time the question as to whether section 834 of the Corporations Code1 (Stats. 1949, ch. 499, § l).is validly applicable to a stockholder’s derivative suit commenced after the effective date of the statute but concerning wrongs allegedly committed before that date and which suit is instituted by a shareholder who acquired his stock otherwise than by operation of law, and at a time subsequent to the commission of the wrongs complained of but prior to enactment of the statute. We conclude that the statute is procedural, that application of it here…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Shielcrawt v. MoffettNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API