Legal Opinion

National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 23, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 06-0718PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises out of an action to judicially foreclose a deed of trust executed by Defendant/Appellant Morgen Thruston to secure a construction loan made to her by Plaintiff/Appellee National Bank of Arizona. On appeal, Morgen Thruston and her husband, Howard, argue the superior court should not have entered summary judgment against them because the Bank failed to present evidence negating their affirmative defenses. Alternatively, they argue the Bank was prohibited from judicially foreclosing the deed of trust based on a non-monetary default because this default…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Comerica Bank v. MAHMOODICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Modular Mining System, Inc. v. Jigsaw Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Sitton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API