Legal Opinion
Micron Technology, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 7, 2001No. 00-1058, 00-1060PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
This case presents important questions concerning the interpretation of the 1994 amendments to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“Act”), codified in the United States Code in Chapter 4 of Title 19. We conclude that the amendments are ambiguous as to the *1303scope of the indirect selling expenses to be dedueted under 19 U.S.C. § 1677a(d)(l)(D) (1999).1 Because we also conclude that the Department of Commerce’s interpretation of that provision is reasonable, we defer to that interpretation under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shakeproof Assembly Components, Division of Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Borden, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.