Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 12, 2001No. 99-1575, 99-1576PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

This is a trade case involving the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) methodology used to conduct the level of trade (“LOT”) comparison between the constructed export price (“CEP”) and the normal value under 19 U.S.C. § 1677b(a)(7)(A) (1999). In Borden, Inc. v. United States, 4 F.Supp.2d 1221 (C.I.T. 1998) (“Borden I ”), the Court of International Trade held that the statutory provision for LOT adjustments clearly provides that selling expenses set forth in 19 U.S.C. § 1677a(d) (1999) should not be deducted from CEP before making the LOT comparison. 4 F.Supp.2d at 1241.

D…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borden, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  3. Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  2. NSK Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  3. NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  4. Tri Union Frozen Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  5. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API