Legal Opinion
AK Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 25, 2004No. SLIP OP.04-108, 03-00102PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge.
[On Rule 56.2 motion for summary judgment regarding deductibility of indirect selling expenses and inference on missing data at antidumping duty administrative review, judgment for the defendant.]
Plaintiff AK Steel Corporation, a domestic petitioner, contests Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From, Germany; Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 68 Fed. Reg. 6716 (Feb. 10, 2003) {‘Final Results”), PR 1 50 (amended at 68 Fed. Reg. 14193 (Mar. 24, 2003), PR 54), as administered by the Department of Commerce, International Trade…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- American Silicon Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Cultivos Miramonte S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Fresh Garlic Producers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Husteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.