State v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
The defendants in this consolidated proceeding appeal from convictions of illegal possession of narcotics in violation of ORS 474.020. The main questions presented by these appeals are (1) does Oregon recognize the “exigent circumstances” exception to the requirements of its “knock and announce” statute, ORS 133.290, and (2) did such “exigent circumstances” exist in these cases? For the reasons which follow our answer to both of the questions is, “yes.”
The defendant Gravon also assigns as error the court’s refusal to allow him to call the defendant Jones as a witness before the jury. Jones…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. RosalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. GasteloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. ValentineOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GassnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. RauchIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DarrochCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.