Legal Opinion

People v. Rosales

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1968No. Crim. 11533PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of possession of heroin. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500.) The prosecution was based on the discovery of heroin on defendant’s person at the time of his arrest. Defendant contends that the heroin was obtained by an unconstitutional search and seizure by the arresting officers.

Defendant and Fred Berru were arrested in a house in the Paeoima area of Los Angeles County. They were apprehended by Parole Officer Damerell, San Fernando Police Officer Barbarick, and two other police officers. Officer Barbariek had received information that defendant and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. GasteloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API