Legal Opinion
State v. Rauch
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1978No. 12563PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*588DONALDSON, Justice.
The state appeals a district court order, pursuant to I.C. § 19-2804(2) (Supp.1976) and Rule 11(c)(4), I.A.R., suppressing certain evidence, on the ground that law enforcement officers failed to comply with Idaho’s “knock and announce” statutes, I.C. §§ 19-611, 19-4409, in executing the arrest of the defendant and the subsequent seizure of evidence. The basic facts were established at a hearing on the suppression motion.
The home of the defendant, Daniel Rauch, was under surveillance for suspected drug traffic by the Idaho Bureau of Narcotics. Early in the day an officer had…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Plant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.