Legal Opinion

Hynes v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1920No. Civ. No. 3355PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Chas. Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The respondent, as the administrator of the estate of Alexander Hay, deceased, sued the appellant to recover certain bonds, or their value. In a second count the plaintiff sought to recover $500 with interest claimed to have been loaned by Hay to the defendant. The defendant denied the allegations of ownership of the bonds by the estate, and alleged affirmatively that Hay had canceled the note given by her to evidence the five hundred dollar loan. The case was tried without a jury. The trial court found that the defendant was not entitled to certain of the bonds claimed to .have been given…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gomez v. CecenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Lejeune v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API