Legal Opinion
Lejeune v. General Petroleum Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8325PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
With certain exceptions and additional observations which will hereinafter appear the court adopts the opinion of Justice pro tern. Lamberson originally filed in this case:
11 The plaintiff was employed as an able seaman on the tank steamer Lebee, owned and operated by the defendant. Because of injuries received while the ship was weighing anchor off the town of Davenport, Santa Cruz county, this action for the recovery of damages has been brought against defendant under the provisions of the Jones Act (46 U. S. C. A., sec. 688), which reads as follows: ‘Any seaman who shall suffer…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.