Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1998No. C2-96-2475PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

Respondent Melissa Gleason is physically disabled. She suffers from a form of muscular dystrophy known as muscular atrophy, and is confined to a wheelchair. Gleason sued the Metropolitan Council Transit Operations (“MCTO”), the bus driver and a supervisor alleging disability discrimination and various torts arising from an incident when she boarded a bus on December 2, 1995. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis of statutory immunity and official immunity was denied by the district court. The court of appeals held that Gleason’s tort claims were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Dokman v. County of HennepinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Sletten v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Vassallo ex rel. Brown v. MajeskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API