Legal Opinion
Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Lungren
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 23, 1992No. C-92-0660 MHPPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, The Association of National Advertisers, et al., bring this action against defendant Daniel Lungren, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California. 1 Plaintiffs challenge section 17508.5 of the California Business and Professions Code, which regulates certain environmental claims used in advertising, on the grounds that: (1) the statute violates plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights, and (2) it is unconstitutionally vague. The matter is presently before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgement. After carefully…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hill v. Roll International Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bland v. FesslerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Bland v. FesslerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
- Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.