Legal Opinion
Resolution Trust Corp. v. California
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 4, 1994No. CV 92-6230 RGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Subdivision 26661 of the California Food and Agricultural Code (the “California Act” or the “Act”) restricts the use by wholesalers of the term “fresh” on poultry product labels to poultry that has been stored at temperatures above 25 degrees.1 The Act became effective on January 1, 1994.
Plaintiffs are three poultry and meat trade associations. Some of plaintiffs’ members process poultry for wholesale distribution in California from outside of the State. In an action filed December 2,1993, plaintiffs claim that the California Act is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. State of Cal.District Court, C.D. California · 1994
- Comm. of Mass v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Comm. of Mass v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997