Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Lungren
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CHOY; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, the Association of National Advertisers, Inc., et al. (Trade Associations), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment upholding the constitutionality of California Business and Professions Code § 17508.5. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Section 17508.5 makes it unlawful for a manufacturer or distributor of consumer goods to represent that its products are “ozone friendly”, “biodegradable”, “photode-gradable”, “recyclable” or “recycled” unless…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Erwin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Association Of National Advertisers, Inc. v. LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994