Legal Opinion

Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Lungren

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1994No. 93-15644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CHOY; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, the Association of National Advertisers, Inc., et al. (Trade Associations), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment upholding the constitutionality of California Business and Professions Code § 17508.5. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Section 17508.5 makes it unlawful for a manufacturer or distributor of consumer goods to represent that its products are “ozone friendly”, “biodegradable”, “photode-gradable”, “recyclable” or “recycled” unless…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erwin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Association Of National Advertisers, Inc. v. LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API