Legal Opinion
Bland v. Fessler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1996No. 95-55522PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 1, 1996, Slip op. 3923, is withdrawn.
OPINION
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal the grant of summary judgment dismissing their action against the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission and the dismissal on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion of their action against the Attorney General of California. Plaintiffs’ action challenges on First Amendment grounds two California statutes that regulate Automatic Dialing and Announcing Devices (“ADADs”), machines that dial telephone numbers and deliver prerecorded messages. We affirm.
*731I. FACTS AND PRIOR…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Rhoades v. Avon Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Suever v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Betsy Bayless Janet Napolitano, in Her Official Capacity as the Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- G.K. Ltd. Travel, an Oregon Corporation Wh Gillison Ramsay Signs, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Kathleen Kusudo v. City of Lake Oswego Sandy IngallsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.