Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1919No. 8121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; E. B. Muse, Judge. Action by F. E. Anderson and others, composing the firm of Anderson, Clayton & Co., against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

F. E. Anderson, M. D. Anderson, W. L. Clayton, and B. Clayton, composing the firm of Anderson, Clayton & Co. brought this suit to recover from the appel lant, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway j Company $1,881.56, with interest from Feb- j ruary 19, 1915, as the value of 49 bales of j cotton alleged to have been' delivered to the I appellant at Ballinger, Tex., on February 9, j 1915, and accepted by it for transportatio1 to Houston, Tex., and which it is alleged j should have been delivered to the plaintiff at j Houston, Tex., on February 19, 1915. The ¡ defendant answered by general demurrer…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TrawickTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Arthur v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. E. L. & R. R. R'y Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Texas Midland Railroad v. H. L. Edwards & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Martin, Wise & FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houston T. C. R. Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Thornton v. Athens Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. RY. Co. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Hines v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Texas & N. O. R. v. J. Kahn & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API