Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. RY. Co. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1923No. 374-3402PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.

This suit was instituted by defendant in error, Anderson, Clayton & Co., to recover of plaintiff in error, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company, the value of 49 bales of cotton destroyed by fire while located in a car into which it had béen loaded.

The facts epitomized are: That in 1915, the firm of Nicholson & Baker, was engaged in buying cotton in the vicinity of Ballinger *1032to sell to exporters. Tlie cotton so purchased was concentrated upon the Texas Compress Company’s platform at Ballinger, where it was weighed, tagged, and a sample taken from each bale by the compress company. These…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Fletcher L. Yarbrough & Co. v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Terrell Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Askew Saddlery Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Rio Grande City Ry. Co. v. GuerraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API