Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Martin, Wise & Fitzhugh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 29, 1896No. 2121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. W. D. Harris.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, the Denver, Texas & Fort Worth Railway Co. and the Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co., prosecute this writ from a judgment in the sum of $1450, recovered by the defendants in error, Martin, Wise & Fitzhugh, as damages for the loss of certain cotton while in the custody of the companies.

On March 9, 1889, defendants’ agent at Rhome, Texas, made with the plaintiffs a verbal agreement for the shipment upon delivery, and the transportation from that point to Liverpool, England, of 52 bales of cotton. On the 11th, 12th and 13th of March the cotton was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin, Wise & Fitzhugh v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Midland Railroad v. H. L. Edwards & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Daugherty v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API