Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Such

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1901No. S.F. No. 2782PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff’s testate was killed on Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, having been struck by a wagon drawn by a runaway horse belonging to defendant Nelson, and this action was to recover damages for the death. At the close of the evidence for plaintiff, the court granted a motion for non-suit. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The driver of the horse was not called by plaintiff as a witness, and there was no evidence as to what caused the horse to run away. The witnesses Taggard and Wilson testified that their attention was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McGrathIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Button v. FrinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  5. Bennett v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API