Risdon v. Yates
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. F. E. Johnston, H. L. Johnston, and L. E. Johnston, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to recover damages for an assault and battery committed upon plaintiff by defendant. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered. Defendant prosecutes this appeal from the judgment on the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions shows that the evidence was conflicting, and it is conceded that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. Several errors are claimed as to rulings of the court and in giving instructions. This discussion will be confined only to the matters deemed material.
More than…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Root v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Hauser v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Granite Gold Mining Co. v. MaginnessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hobart v. TyrrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by24 opinions
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1962
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rosenberg v. WittenbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.