Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Falkenstien

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1930No. 29,006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The question involved in this appeal is whether the holder of a note given by a person now deceased can maintain an action on such note against the administrator of the estate by bringing it in the district court more than one year after the appointment and qualification of the administrator, it being claimed that the limitations and restrictions which might bar it in the probate court do not apply to actions in the district court.

The plaintiff herein brought this action in the district court of Pottawatomie county two years and three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanson v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Manley v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Scroggs v. TuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Hoover v. Estate of HooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Farmers State Bank v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burris v. BurrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Allen v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Bristow v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Phillips v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Jordan v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API