Legal Opinion

Burris v. Burris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1934No. 32,045PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*209The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action for a partnership accounting brought by a surviving partner. Substantially the same relief was sought in Burris v. Burris, 137 Kan. 831, 22 P. 2d 976, in which plaintiff failed on account of his not having duly qualified as such surviving partner. The petition in that case was filed March 24, 1932, and after the above decision was handed down and on July 19, 1933, that case was dismissed without prejudice in the lower court, and within a year thereafter and on November 6, 1933, the present action was filed.

The amended…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bauserman v. CharlottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Henshaw v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Carr v. CatlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Dubbs v. HaworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Big Four Implement Co. v. KeyserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wirt v. EsreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Dixon v. FlukerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Waddell v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Griffith v. Stout Remodeling, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Gaynes v. WallingfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API