Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Estate of Hoover

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 22,057PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Richard E. Bird, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

O. D. Kirk was appointed to appear and manage the defense of the estate pf Samuel H. Hoover, deceased, against a claim filed by E. G. Hoover, who was sole executor of the will of Samuel H. Hoover. Judgment was rendered in favor of E. G. Hoover, and O. D. Kirk appeals.

Sometime prior to July 11,1912, Samuel H. Hoover had been, the owner of 320 acres of valuable land near Wichita-. About that time, or prior thereto, he deeded the land to his children; 160 acres thereof to E. G. Hoover, the claimant in this action, and the remainder to his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bauserman v. CharlottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. ShoupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Kulp v. KulpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Crockett v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Brown v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sledd v. MunsellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Farmers State Bank v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Woodson v. RaynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Bristow v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. In Re Estate of CarrellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API