Legal Opinion

Wice v. Schilling

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1954No. Civ. 19594PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

On March 16,1949, the plaintiffs and the defendants Schilling and Greenberg agreed to exchange real property. The property to be received by plaintiffs consisted of three apartment buildings at 312-318 East Palmer Street in Glendale. One of the conditions of the exchange, as shown by the escrow instructions, was that said defendants would place in escrow for delivery to plaintiffs “A termite clearance issued by a licensed termite control company.” Defendant Van Kolken, a termite exterminator, was doing business as Termite and Structural Pest Control. The first cause of action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. WardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Crystal Pier Amusement Co. v. CannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Strutzel v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Twing v. SchottWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Christiansen v. RoddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Shapiro v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API