Strutzel v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Wilbert C. Hamilton, hereinafter referred to as defendant, appeals from an adverse judgment after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover upon a common count for money had and received, predicated upon the theory that plaintiffs’ money was obtained by defendant through false representations.
Facts: The record being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs (respondents) (Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 [146 P.2d 424]) discloses that plaintiffs Strutzel and Cioffi were partners engaged in the metal parts business. Their partnership agreement had been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Crystal Pier Amusement Co. v. CannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Beeman v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Ke-Wash Company v. Stauffer Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Cohen v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.