Legal Opinion
Hilgraeve Corp. v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 15, 2003No. CIV. 97-40370PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the following motions: Plaintiffs motion to file an amended complaint [docket entry 304]; Defendant’s motion to modify the cut-off date for filing dispositive motions [docket entry 311]; Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiffs reply brief [docket entry 324]; and Defendant’s motion for leave to brief the issue of attorney’s fees and costs [docket entry 325]. The Court elects to resolve these motions without a hearing. See LR 7.1(e)(3). For reasons set forth below, the Court shall grant Plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Zurich Insurance Company v. Logitrans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Tidik v. RitsemaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- Automated Information Processing, Inc. v. Genesys Solutions Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
- Fakhri v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Battle Sports Science, LLC v. Shock Doctor, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2016
- Hilgraeve, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Hilgraeve, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.