Legal Opinion
Battle Sports Science, LLC v. Shock Doctor, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided December 2, 2016No. 8:16CV352PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. .United States District Judge
Battle Sports Science, LLC (“Battle Sports”) and Active Brands Company, LLC (“Active Brands”), both Nebraska limited liability companies with their principal places of business in Nebraska, bring this action against Shock Doctor, Inc. (“Shock Doctor”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in *828Minnesota. In their Amended Complaint (Filing No. 18), Battle Sports and Active Brands allege, among other things, that Shock Doctor infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,931,488 (the “’488 Patent”), U.S. Patent No.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boitnott v. Border Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Abbott Laboratories v. Revitalyte LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Boitnott v. Border Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Dixon Ventures Inc v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021
- HydraAssist LLC v. RK Partnership LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.