Hilgraeve, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment to limit damages. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), the Court concludes that a hearing would not aid significantly in the disposition of this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny Defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff Hilgraeve, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) is a Michigan corporation with its principal place of business in Michigan. Plaintiff is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,319,776 (“ ’776 patent”), which issued on June 7, 1994 to inventors John K. Hile,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Imagexpo, L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics v. Spectrum SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- New Medium LLC v. Barco N.V.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2007