Legal Opinion

Fakhri v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 20, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-126, Court No. 98-08-02658PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

Firoze A. Fakhri, who does business as “International Trading Company” (“Int’l Trading Co.”), an importer of shop towels from Bangladesh, seeks recovery of expenses and fees under the Equal Access To Justice Act (“EAJA”) 1 for being forced to relitigate an issue previously decided in a case between the same parties. 2 Defendant United States claims that an EAJA award is unavailable to Plaintiff, arguing its position in the second case was substantially justified, and that Int’l Trading Co. may not recover because this case was filed in his fictitious…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  3. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Shah Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API