Legal Opinion
Hilgraeve, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 9, 2003No. CIV. 97-40370PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity; (2) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment that the asserted claims of the ’776 patent are not invalid; and (3) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment of infringement. The Court heard oral argument on the first two motions at a hearing held on April 23, 2003. The Court heard oral argument on the third motion at a hearing held on May 12, 2003. For reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hilgraeve, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- DAEDALUS BLUE, LLC v. MicroStrategy IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023