Legal Opinion

Aaron v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1935No. 23782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs in error were sureties on a supersedeas bond for Southwest Tank Company, in Southwestern Tank Co. v. Morrow, 115 Okla. 97, 241 P. 1097, in this court, wherein said Southwest Tank Company was plaintiff in error and R. J. Morrow defendant in error. That cause was affirmed on December 1, 1925, and judgment duly entered by this court on said bond against said sureties (plaintiffs in error in tbe present appeal).

Thereafter, mandate was issued and sent down to the trial court on February 12, 192<1. the mandate closing with these words:

“Now. therefore, you are hereby commanded to cause…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Gilliland v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Sneary v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Harris v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Southwestern Tank Co. v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Methvin v. MethvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Methvin v. MethvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API