Legal Opinion
Harris v. Chambers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 1926No. 17409PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
This is an original proceeding brought in this court to require the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., to carry into effect the mandate, of this court in cause No. 13646, Riverside Oil & Refining Co., a corporation, et al. v. S. D. Lynch et al., 114 Okla. 198, 243 Pac. 967.
Said case was one brought, originally, in the discrict court of Oklahoma county by certain minority stockholders of the Riverside Oil & Refining Company, a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in this state, for the benefit of the corporation, against the directors ¡and other officers and managers of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- West v. BrashearSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Smedsrud v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Chronic Pain Associates, Inc. v. BubenikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.