Methvin v. Methvin

On the former appeal of this case (In re Methvin’s Guardianship, 174 Okla. 75, 49 P. 2d 514) we held that the district court of Caddo county never acquired jurisdiction of the case, due to the fact that on the attempted appeal from the county court of Caddo county to the district court the bond required by 58 O. S. 1941 § 725 was not given. We thereupon reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded the case, with directions to that court to dismiss the appeal. That became the law of this case.

The fact that Harjo v. Aubrey, 184 Okla. 344, 87 P. 2d 140, has been adopted since the…