Legal Opinion

Southwestern Tank Co. v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1925No. 14322PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff below, and the defendant in error was the defendant. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff, an Oklahoma corporation, brought its suit against the defendant to recover upon eleven promissory notes given to plaintiff by defendant, all dated September 7, 1920, each for the sum of $83.33, and bearing interest at 10 per cent, per annum, and each providing for a $10' attorney fee; and the first falling due on the 7th of October, 1920, and one falling due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. General Bonding & Casualty Insurance v. MoseleyTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lee v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Don Johnston Drilling Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Bell, SEC. of Banking v. AubelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Aaron v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Eastern Oklahoma Television Co. v. Ameco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Holmes v. Durant Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API