Legal Opinion

THK America, Inc. v. NSK, LTD.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 17, 1996No. 90 C 6049PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case was brought by Plaintiff, THK America, Inc. (“THK”), charging Defendants, NSK, Ltd. and NSK Corporation (collectively, “NSK”), with willful infringement of U.S. Patents 4,040,679 (“ ’679 Patent”) and 4,253,709 (“ ’709 Patent”). NSK has counterclaimed that THK’s patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed. The alleged infringing devices are linear grids— devices which facilitate linear movement of an item along a fixed rail.

Discovery has been closed and in preparation for submission of final pretrial order…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Electro Medical Systems, S.A. v. Cooper Life Sciences, Inc., Dentsply International Inc., and Dentsply Research & Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  2. Wilson v. SicoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Lam Research Corp. v. Schunk SemiconductorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Arroyo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  5. Bizmark, Inc. v. Kroger Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API