Legal Opinion
Moore v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided July 21, 2004No. 10-02-00076-CRPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
Kerry Eugene Moore’s conviction for retaliation arises from an altercation between Moore and a school superintendent. The State charged Moore with assault on a public servant and retaliation. A jury acquitted Moore on the assault charge but convicted him of retaliation. Moore contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction and that the court erred by: (1) failing to quash the indictment or require the State to elect whether to prosecute him for assault or retaliation; (2) refusing to allow impeachment of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Ex Parte MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Wiggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- In re S.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.