State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
James Thompson appeals his conviction for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that the police obtained when they *791arrested him at his home. He argues that his outstanding arrest warrant for failure to appear at a contempt hearing, which arose out of a child support issue, did not support the use of a nonconsensual entry into his travel trailer. We hold that police may use RCW 10.31.040, which authorizes forcible entry for arrests “in criminal actions,” where there is a general arrest warrant and we…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.