Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 2, 2002No. 27140-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

James Thompson appeals his conviction for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that the police obtained when they *791arrested him at his home. He argues that his outstanding arrest warrant for failure to appear at a contempt hearing, which arose out of a child support issue, did not support the use of a nonconsensual entry into his travel trailer. We hold that police may use RCW 10.31.040, which authorizes forcible entry for arrests “in criminal actions,” where there is a general arrest warrant and we…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API