Legal Opinion

State v. Flippo

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2002No. 30527PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Chief Justice.

James Michael Flippo (hereinafter referred to as “Mr. Flippo”), appellant/defendant below, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Fayette County denying his motion for a new trial. In the motion for a new trial, Mi'. Flippo contended that photographs of a third party, Joel Boggess (hereinafter referred to as “Mr. Boggess”), were unlawfully seized and therefore should not have been introduced as evidence during the trial. The trial court held that the photographs were lawfully seized under the implied consent or inevitable discovery exception to the warrant…

2Cases cited158 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. State v. YoungbloodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State of West Virginia v. Lillie Mae TrailWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API