Legal Opinion
State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 2, 2002No. 27140-1-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
51 P.3d 143 (2002)
112 Wash.App. 787
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
James Ross THOMPSON, Appellant.
No. 27140-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 2, 2002.
Rita Joan Griffith, Seattle, for Appellant.
Kathleen Proctor, Dpty Pros Attorney, Maureen Goodman, Rule 9 Intern, Tacoma, for Respondent.
SEINFELD, J.
James Thompson appeals his conviction for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that the police obtained when they arrested him at his home. He argues that his outstanding arrest warrant…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2004