Legal Opinion
BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AG v. Sandoz, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 28, 2011No. 08 Civ. 03710(PGG), 08 Civ. 08112(PGG)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge.
These actions arise from Defendants’ filing of Abbreviated New Drug Applications concerning two of Plaintiffs’ brand-name oral contraceptive prescription drugs: Yasmin and Yaz. As a result of two prior decisions 1 and certain stipulations between the parties, 2 only Defendant Sandoz, Inc.’s Sherman Act counterclaims remain to be decided.
In a March 29, 2010 Memorandum Opinion and Order, this Court dismissed San-doz’s Sherman Act counterclaims but granted leave to amend. Bayer Schera Pharma AG v. Sandoz, Inc., Nos. 08 Civ. 03710(PGG),…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Concord Associates, L.P. v. Entertainment Properties TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- In re Crude Oil Commodity Futures LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Shak v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Emp'rs Health & Welfare Fund v. Teikoku Pharma United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.